Noun piles

This is a "Tip of the Day" I sent to my research group yesterday on the topic of noun piles. That is, the sometimes undesirability of using nouns as adjectives.

-------------------------

Dear Group,

As many of you know, I believe that the overuse of nouns to modify other nouns (noun piles) makes prose difficult to read. I’ve taken an excerpt from one of our recent articles and artificially loaded one version with noun piles of the type I often see in inexperienced writing. The other version is the published original which passed my test for readability. Before I say which is which, please decide for yourself which one is easier to understand. Then, go through your own writing, look for noun piles, and sort them all out. (It’s not a noun pile if the brain reads it as a single word, e.g., flow rate, pepperoni pizza. Those are okay.)

Cheers,

Darren 

--------------------------

Example 1

The glass transition temperature (Tg) is a second-order phase transition that ultimately describes the thermally activated chain reorganization in the polymer specimen amorphous domains. A density vs temperature plot exhibits a slope change in the vicinity of Tg (Figure 6). Similarly, a heat flow vs temperature plot measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) reveals a heat capacity increase. Below Tg, a polymer is said to be glassy; above the Tg, it is rubbery. In a purely amorphous sample (e.g., atactic polystyrene), the material flows readily above its Tg. A semicrystalline sample above its Tg, but below crystalline domain melting temperature (Tm), exists as an ordinary time scale solid and is said to be in its elastomeric state. The position of the polymer Tg relative to its operating temperature is thus an important polymer mechanical property predictor. The Tg also influences the polymer solid state morphological stability, which can be problematic if the most conducive to device performance morphology is not the most thermodynamically stable one. Composite system devices, e.g., bulk heterojunction solar cells, can phase separate with deleterious consequences if operated above their Tg. The requirement that a bulk heterojunction solar cell have a morphologically stable high Tg and a mechanically stable low Tg is another competing criterion. For an account of the Tg role in photovoltaic device operation and stability, see the comprehensive review by Muller.

Example 2

The glass transition temperature (Tg ) is a second-order phase transition that ultimately describes the thermally activated reorganization of chains in the amorphous domains of a polymer specimen. A plot of density vs temperature exhibits a change in slope in the vicinity of Tg  (Figure 6). Similarly, a plot of heat flow vs temperature measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) reveals an increase in heat capacity. Below Tg , a polymer is said to be glassy; above the Tg , it is rubbery. In a purely amorphous sample (e.g., atactic polystyrene), the material flows readily above its Tg. A semicrystalline sample above its Tg, but below the temperature at which its crystalline domains melt (Tm), exists as a solid at ordinary time scales and is said to be in its elastomeric state. The position of the Tg of a polymer relative to its operating temperature is thus an important predictor of the mechanical properties of a polymer. The Tg also influences the morphological stability of the solid state of the polymer, which can be problematic if the morphology that is most conducive to device performance is not the most thermodynamically stable one. Devices based on composite systems, e.g., bulk heterojunction solar cells, can phase separate with deleterious consequences if operated above their Tg. The requirement that a bulk heterojunction solar cell have a high Tg for morphological stability and a low Tg  for mechanical stability is another competing criterion. For an account of the role of Tg in the operation and stability of organic photovoltaic devices, see the comprehensive review by Muller.

Darren's Tips of the Day: Compilation

Every so often, I send an email to my group with the subject "Tip of the day." Here is a compilation.


Always push hardest on the project that is closest to being published. Analogies in real life are the coin-pusher games at rural state fairs:

 See that roll of quarters in the bottom-left? That's your most advanced project!

See that roll of quarters in the bottom-left? That's your most advanced project!

Another analogy is in exams: do the easy problems first so that you don’t leave any points on the table when time is called.

You should also probably eat that cookie now. Ants may get to it if you leave it for later.

Darren


When taking videos on a smartphone, turn it sideways so that it fills up a 16:9 display in the right orientation.

This tip of the day also applies to posting videos to your friends and family on your social mediapage face.

Cheers,

Darren


Dear All,

I’d like to impose a friendly New Year’s Resolution on everyone in the group: please read all of our papers as they are published (starting in 2017). We already have four papers in 2017, so if you haven’t read them, please do. The purpose in reading our own papers is manifold:

1) You will see what constitutes good writing and visual style

2) You will know what your lab mates have been up to

3) You will learn something new

4) You will be able to find areas of collaboration

I’ve attached the copyedited version of Sam’s paper, which is a more refined version of the “just accepted” version available online.

Thanks!!

Darren


Focus on your (and our) uniqueness. It is much easier to realize goals in life if we continuously reinvest and use the skills that are unique to us. You wouldn’t use anything less than the sharpest arrow in your quiver to fell one of the Dothraki horde; similarly you wouldn’t aim to publish a paper in CDMA technology when you have been honing your skills for the last ten years in polymer engineering! It’s a lot like destroying a Borg ship: you have to focus all of your effort on a single spot on a seemingly impenetrable surface. You cannot succeed any other way. Then, only then, a Jedi will you be.

Cheers!

Darren


Dear All,

A few comments on the use of hyphens. 

In the vast majority of cases, a hyphen is used for compound adjectives:

"thin-film science” is correct, whereas “the science of thin-films” is incorrect (there is no such thing as a “thin-film”). “spin coating a film” is correct, as is a “spin-coated film”. “the technique known as spin-coating” is incorrect.

Adverbs (usually signaled by words ending in “ly,” which modify verbs and adjectives) do not require hyphens. “Well” is usually also an adverb, so “well-known” is incorrect, no matter what Word tells you.

Please use an n-dash for minus signs. Thus “4 minus two” is written “4 – 2” not “4 - 2.” The n-dash can be obtained on a mac using “option” + “-“.

I hope you enjoyed this bit of pedantry.

Darren


I know it is Saturday, but here is oldie but goodie about why you should never use two spaces after a period (George Whitesides can be safely ignored on this point). This email does not refer to anyone in particular; I’m reading a lot of stuff this weekend.

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2011/01/space_invaders.html

Enjoy,Darren


To improve your writing, read it out loud. You will immediately detect awkward, misleading, and incomprehensible sentences. The fix in most cases is to shorten your sentences. Shorten them to an extent that may seem ridiculous. After you have shortened your sentence, or have broken it up into multiple sentences, read it again. Take pride in the clarity of your writing.

Darren


Discarded pizza boxes are an inexpensive source of cheese.

(Credit to Unkie Herb Simpson)


Dear Group,

When preparing a new syringe to extrude EGaIn, be sure to cut off the bevel (i.e., the sharp tip) of the needle with either a wire cutter or a hacksaw (using the vice to hold the sharp end).

Cheers,

Darren

Research update: Spring & Summer 2017

Solar Energy. Thanks to the generous gift of the B Quest Giving Fund and Benefunder, we have been able to start our work in earnest on the “solar tarp,” or an ultraflexible solar panel that can be balled up and unfurled for off-grid applications. Such applications account for over a thousand Hoover Dam’s worth of carbon emissions globally (mostly in the developing world).  In the last month, we have made a discovery in the lab which allows us to make thin films of light-absorbing active materials of much higher quality than has been possible before. We believe that the knowledge we are creating will also make grid-scale printed solar cells more stable against thermal and mechanical insults in the outdoor environment.

Our paper on the mechanical robustness of printed thin-film solar cells was published in Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. In this paper, we built a robot to bend and twist printed solar modules over tens of thousands of cycles of deformation. We can also use computer modeling to predict where in the device the materials are likely to fail first, and to re-engineer the devices to mitigate this type of failure. This first-of-its-kind project is a collaboration between my group and the group of Frederik Krebs at the Danish Technical University.

 mohammad alkhadra – runner-up for best poster at the sustainable power and energy summit.

mohammad alkhadra – runner-up for best poster at the sustainable power and energy summit.

Congratulations to Mohammad Alkhadra (BS/MS student) for winning 2nd prize in the poster pitch competition at the UCSD Sustainable Power and Energy Summit on July 18. Mohammad was also the top student in our graduating class of chemical engineering seniors (3.99 GPA, along with several publications from my group, including a co-first author paper in the prestigious journal Chemistry of Materials). This year, our department graduated more chemical engineering BS students than any other program in the US (Georgia Tech was number two).

Congratulations to Dr. Laure Kayser (postdoctoral scholar) for winning the grant prize in the poster competition at the 3rd Annual Functional Polymeric Materials conference in Rome. Her work focuses on the synthesis of new transparent conductive electrodes for flexible printed solar cells based on organic and perovskite semiconductors.

 Laure accepting her award at the functional polymeric materials conference in rome.

Laure accepting her award at the functional polymeric materials conference in rome.

Our project funded by the California Energy Commission on hybrid perovskite solar cells is beginning this summer. The team consists of the research groups of David Fenning (PI), along with me, Shirley Meng, and Bill Torre (co-PIs). The goal is to produce thin-film modules and test them in the UCSD microgrid (UCSD generates all of its own energy, a significant fraction of which is solar). Our project was one of only two funded in California.

Wearable Sensors and Cancer Research. Graduate students Julian Ramirez and Daniel Rodriquez travelled to MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston to test a new device we have invented on human subjects. The device monitors the swallowing activity of head and neck cancer patients following radiation therapy. The device, based on graphene decorated with metal nanoparticles, measures the stretching of the skin and the electrical activity of the swallowing muscles. When combined with a machine-learning algorithm, the devices can automatically distinguish healthy swallows from unhealthy ones and send the data wirelessly to a physician. Julian and Daniel conducted the trial on 14 laryngeal cancer survivors, 7 of whom had developed swallowing dysfunction, and 7 of whom had not. This work represents a milestone in our group, as it is the first human-subject trial for a device we have invented. We are writing up our preliminary results and will submit to a peer-reviewed journal in the coming weeks.

 Liban jibril – author of the first undergraduate solo-first-author paper from our group! the topic of the paper is single-nanowire strain sensors for wearable sensors and structural health monitoring fabricated by nanoskiving.

Liban jibril – author of the first undergraduate solo-first-author paper from our group! the topic of the paper is single-nanowire strain sensors for wearable sensors and structural health monitoring fabricated by nanoskiving.

Congratulations to Liban Jibril for publishing a paper on wearable sensors consisting of individual nanowires as the active elements. This is the first paper from our group to which first-author credit goes solely to an undergraduate. Liban will be joining the PhD program in chemical engineering at Northwestern in September.

Organic Haptics. Congratulations to Tim O’Connor, who defended his PhD on August 1st as the fifth PhD graduate of our group.

This month concludes undergraduate Melissa Tan’s internship in our group. Melissa is a rising senior undergraduate at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore. In her time with us, she invented a new mode of kinesthetic actuation (i.e., force feedback) in a glove, which uses a plastic material which can be stiffened or softened using a flexible heater/cooler. The purpose of the invention is for rehabilitation of individuals with neurological disorders and to simulate the physical resistance of virtual objects in medical training and virtual and augmented reality. We are hoping Melissa decides to join us in the Fall of 2018 for her PhD ;)

 san diego comic con 2017. left to right: jeanne lemaster, chava angell, aaron saunders, robin ihnfeldt, darren lipomi.

san diego comic con 2017. left to right: jeanne lemaster, chava angell, aaron saunders, robin ihnfeldt, darren lipomi.

Outreach. On July 20th, I participated in a panel discussion at Comic Con 2017 entitled “Nanotechnology: Fact or Fiction.” The panel was extraordinarily well attended, with every one of the 300+ seats filled.

Alumni News. Aliaksandr Zaretski (PhD 2016) and his spin-out from my group GrollTex, Inc., which last year raised a seed round of $1.2M to commercialize large-area single-layer graphene, was covered on the front page of the San Diego Business Journal. GrollTex reached a milestone in May by selling its first batch of commercial products.

 alex zaretski, CTO and founder of Grolltex, Inc.

alex zaretski, CTO and founder of Grolltex, Inc.

Suchol Savagatrup (PhD 2016), currently a postdoctoral researcher at MIT, won the prestigious postdoctoral fellowship from the National Institutes of Health. Suchol’s fellowship will help him develop a lab-on-a-chip devices to measure cellular trauma as the result of traumatic brain injury (TBI) suffered by soldiers, athletes, and victims of head injuries.

Lessons from working with the press: Cultural considerations and terminology surrounding American Sign Language in engineering research

I am the corresponding author (i.e., the professor who runs the lab which does the work) of the paper The Language of Glove: Wireless gesture decoder with low-power and stretchable hybrid electronics. PLoS One 2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179766. I must take ownership of an issue surrounding this paper that has the potential to insult both the Deaf community and the linguistics community. Since the publication of our paper, it has come to our attention that we used wording surrounding American Sign Language imprecisely. This imprecision possibly led to inaccurate portrayals of this work in the media that suggested that the device described in this paper “translates” American Sign Language (ASL), when in fact what it does is convert signs of the American Manual Alphabet to text. This capability is properly called fingerspelling, and is used by signers to convey loan words from English. American Sign Language is a language rich in complexity and consists of movements of the hands, the arms, the body, and the face, which are well outside the ability of the gloves to detect, much less to translate. Any suggestion that a single electronic glove is in any way capable of translating ASL was unintentional. The device was, in fact, never intended to be an accessibility device, nor could it ever be used as such (the signer could simply write the letters and not bother donning any awkward equipment). This episode, nevertheless, taught me important lessons about the ways in which research is perceived in the public, and for which projects and under what circumstances it makes sense to encourage press coverage.

It is common practice in research in materials science and engineering to produce a rudimentary device to demonstrate practical value of a new material or system of materials. This is why the literature in thin-film electronics is littered with demonstrations of inefficient solar cells, transistors with low charge mobilities, and biosensors that are completely impractical to translate from lab to market. These demonstrations are, in effect, required by editors and peer reviewers to show the value of a new type of electronic material. They also help the researchers to discover challenges of integrating materials into devices, and to communicate these challenges to other researchers in the field. The purpose of our paper in PLoS One was to demonstrate integration of soft electronic materials with low-energy wireless circuitry that can be purchased economically by research laboratories. It was our hope that a complete description of such a device in the peer-reviewed literature would lead to innovation in virtual and augmented reality (e.g., for education and surgical training), devices for physical therapy (e.g., for rehabilitation or for neurological disorders when the sensors are coupled with actuators), and devices for non-verbal communication for first responders (e.g., police). As we are fundamentally organic materials scientists, we were excited to find that a common conductive fluoroelastomer exhibited good mechanical robustness and a high degree of piezoresistance, that is, change in electrical resistance with mechanical strain. In other words, it makes a good sensor for wearable electronics. It has the additional benefits that it can be cast from solution: this capability opens the door to large-scale, printed electronics. Indeed, the repurposing or rediscovery of common materials has a long history in materials science. Consider the use of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS, or "silicone rubber"), which after decades of use in caulking bathtubs and grouting ceramic tiles is also responsible for the development of microfluidics, chip-based biological assays, and implantable electronics. Even if PDMS is not present the final product, it is a safe bet that it was used in the R&D stage. 

We thus sought to showcase the ability of the fluoroelastomer to detect signals by integrating it with a wearable sensor. This device could have been anything, but we chose a glove, because the human hand is an amazing thing: it is capable of creation, exploration, and expression. As a demonstration of the ability of this glove to recognize gestures, we used it to convert the letters of the American Manual Alphabet to text viewable on a smart phone. We chose this alphabet as our model system because it comprises a set of 26 standardized gestures (including stretching strains, pressure strains, and accelerations), which represent a challenge in engineering to detect using our system of materials. Unfortunately, use of the word “translate” with respect to the alphabet used in ASL encouraged some in the media to suggest that the glove could “translate ASL.” This characterization made it possible to interpret this aspect of our paper as an example of cultural appropriation—that is, taking an element from a culture to suit our own needs. Needless to say, this was not our intent. I learned the American Manual Alphabet in elementary school from members of the Deaf community in my hometown of Rochester, NY. In fact, my parents used to take me to the ASL-accessible mass at my church, and I always appreciated the beauty in the expression of language, ideas, and emotions through sign. So, rudimentary fingerspelling as a demonstration made sense to me. I was not so deceived as to think our device would be the first – nor best – device capable of detecting fingerspelling. (A confession: my publication history, of which I am proud, is replete with solar cells that can't power an LED and wearable pulse sensors that you can't wear outside in the rain, but which nevertheless highlight the properties of materials with the idea that they will eventually be made useful for something.) In fact, over the last few years, bright and enthusiastic high school students have used off-the-shelf components to produce other fingerspelling gloves and posted their efforts on YouTube. (For the record, I think it's awesome that young people are taking an interest in working with electronics at a young age. All of my inventions – alarms for my bedroom, and later rudimentary video games made on QBASIC – were, by comparison, characterized by a high degree of crappiness.)

In 2016, a team of students at the University of Washington (UW) won the Lemelson-MIT Student Prize for a glove capable of recognizing gestures. This invention received significant press coverage, which characterized it as capable of “transliterating sign language into text and speech” (SignAloud, http://lemelson.mit.edu/w...). An open letter published by the UW Department of Linguistics to UW’s Office of News and Information objecting to the characterization of this device and similar inventions can be found at the top of the page here, https://catalyst.uw.edu/w... or directly here. We encourage all researchers, tinkerers, and reporters in the field of human-machine interfaces to read and understand the arguments and legitimate concerns made in this letter. To summarize, the open letter takes the position that such devices are designed as a convenience for hearing people as the burden is on the signer to wear the apparatus. (While in principle there exists the possibility of hearing people to use more sophisticated versions of such devices for the purposes of learning ASL—as in the voice-recognition software used for learning spoken languages—such an explicit capability was not mentioned in our paper.) Perhaps a larger issue is that such technologies reinforce the misconception that sign languages represent mere manual versions of spoken languages, when in fact they have their own grammar and syntax, and are capable of expressing ideas and emotions in ways that spoken languages are not: an analogy would be a word or phrase in one spoken language for which there is no adequate translation into another. Characterization of gesture-recognition devices as “sign language translators” suggests that members of the Deaf community “need help” and may contribute to audism—the discrimination against and marginalization of the Deaf.

I learned of the backlash to our paper (and to press coverage thereof) in the linguistics community when a board member from the Linguistics Society of America (LSA) contacted our Dean of Social Sciences at UC San Diego, who herself is a member of the Deaf community and a renowned expert in ASL, with the concerns of the LSA: coverage of our paper contributed to several misunderstandings about ASL and of Deaf Culture. A quick exploration of tweets from the linguistics world around the time our paper was published confirmed that yes, people were upset. My Dean of Engineering forwarded me the concerns of the LSA, and together we all agreed that a clarification of the goals of the paper and an acknowledgement of the cultural issues by me—in the official record of the paper—would be the appropriate response. The LSA board decided not to issue a public statement, on the basis of my official Comment (of which this post is an expanded version), which is now part of the paper as recognized by the rules of PLoS One. While the paper itself was explicit that the device can only convert signs corresponding to the American Manual Alphabet to Latin letters, I  understand why a linguist or a Deaf individual would smack her or his forehead in disbelief in a news story that described my student’s work with the headline “UCSD Engineers Develop Glove that Translates American Sign Language.”

It is critical for researchers and reporters to be aware of cultural issues when communicating scientific results to the media. The business of reporting in science and technology is admittedly difficult. There is an incentive for journalists to focus on the most-clickable, photogenic, or easiest-to-explain aspect of a story. A scientific paper written primarily to teach the results to other scientists (as the vast majority of them are) makes for uninteresting journalism. Moreover, the public may not have the patience (or interest, or time) for learning the values that underpin the choice of a researcher to pursue a particular project. A project is always laden with subtle or implicit arguments that do not make sense outside the frame of reference of the field. For example, our paper, in which the key innovative element was a new system of materials for stretchable hybrid electronics, triggered many of even the most careful outside observers to ask "Why make a 'signing glove' when high school students have already done it on YouTube?" Science journalists cannot possibly be experts in all aspects of every field in which they are asked to report. This limitation is especially consequential when research in the physical sciences and engineering touch on aspects outside of their traditional boundaries. Peer review cannot be expected to catch all instances of overstepping, as the reviewers are generally also physical scientists and engineers, and may also be ignorant of the cultural ramifications. For example, I originally thought the pun in the title of our paper ("The Language of Glove") was cute. I still rather like it, but I now understand its cringeworthiness within the Deaf and linguistics communities (and not in the the good way that all puns aspire to cringeworthiness). The onus is thus on the researcher to be aware of cultural issues and to make sure—to the extent possible—that word choice, nuance, and how the technology may impact a culture is properly conveyed to the journalist and thence to the public. Nevertheless, I remain proud of my students' achievements in the work described in this paper. It was a long slog to get all the materials to play nicely together, and we now have a wonderful new platform on which to test our materials for a wide range of applications.

–Darren

[An earlier version of this post appeared in the Comments section of PLoS One.]